| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Steve E. Site Admin
Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 210 Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Self-lather

Joined: 27 Jun 2007 Posts: 48 Location: Atlanta, Ga
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know, but I would love to cut some of these. They are rad! Any luck finding any?
-Thomas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grooveguy
Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:54 pm Post subject: X-Ray Records |
|
|
| You know, this was offered in the Hugo Gernsback paperback book, "Hints and Kinks," from the late 1940s or early 1950s, I think. I wonder if X-Ray film from that era was different stuff, because I tried cutting a modern X-Ray film and it was pure noise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blight
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 48
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Don't you think those xray images were pressed not cut? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Self-lather

Joined: 27 Jun 2007 Posts: 48 Location: Atlanta, Ga
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm pretty sure those were cut records, but who knows. I bet it wouldn't be hard to fake an xray discs by printing the image on transparencies. The images are pretty easy to come by on the internet.
-Thomas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JayDC
Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 257 Location: District of Columbia
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if you read the article you will find out that the x-ray disc where made by music pirates, selling illegally imported music to a country that at the time was against western culture.
Neeto thing was that the x-ray disc's deteriorated after a couple plays, this must have worked well for the pirates..
I suppose the motivation was because the soviet government controlled the record presses, so the pirates had to find another way.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve E. Site Admin
Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 210 Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| blight wrote: | | Don't you think those xray images were pressed not cut? |
According to one of the responses to the article, they were made on machines designed to make phonocards....so, they were cut! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cuttercollector
Joined: 11 Jun 2006 Posts: 259 Location: San Jose, CA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just adding to the speculation here but in thinking about it, it would involve much more equipment and power etc. to press anything. It would be hard to imagine an underground record pressing plant. If they were to get it done through the back door of the state owned plants, why X rays? Also the images are clearly visable like a picture disc - that's what makes them cool!
I don't think you could press in the grooves without destroying the image unless you inveted another pressing process. I don't know how those little flexi discs or sound sheets start life. Perhaps there is a process to press into already flat plastic sheet but they would have had to plate or get something strong enough to make a stamper somehow.
It all sounds too hard to keep hidden. I bet they were individually cut. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cuttercollector
Joined: 11 Jun 2006 Posts: 259 Location: San Jose, CA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:35 pm Post subject: pressed or cut? |
|
|
Hmmm-
"they were made on machines designed to make phonocards"
I wonder what these machines were, if they were legal to have in the Soviet Union for some other reason and does that mean something like the coin operated cutting machines for recording voice letters etc. that existed in public places in the US, small portable disc cutters, or something for manufacturing, "pressing" if you will, an earlier thin cardboard card stock version of flexible cheap records?
What is a "phonocard"?
Once you know that, you could determine how they were mastered and pressed or whether they were one off individually cut.
The problem with wll the articles I saw was they were much more concerned with the socio-political and/or musical aspects of the records than the technicalities of precisely how they were made. So the person writing might have no idea of exactly how a record is made or how it works and was just reporting facts as they uncovered them from other sources |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve E. Site Admin
Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 210 Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:50 pm Post subject: Re: pressed or cut? |
|
|
| cuttercollector wrote: | | does that mean something like the coin operated cutting machines for recording voice letters etc. that existed in public places in the US |
Indeed. I think that's exactly what they were. Slightly re-jigged machines like that. Apparently the sound quality of these x-ray records is pretty terrible. But in a void, they were a miracle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|